About

Welcome to The Commentary Box; the online amateur sports magazine. The website for sports fans, written by sports fans.

Bob Woolmer - RIP

March 19th, 2007 by Admin

From Wickman of Royal Cricket

Wickman is astonished and gutted to hear the news that Bob Woolmer has died. As a young man Wickman lived in Kent. He could never work out whether he was a Man of Kent or a Kentish Man - but he followed Kent cricket nevertheless. Those were the days with Woolmer, Cowdreys, Iqbal, Ealham etc in the team. The county’s done nothing since.Does anyone think it’s a coincidence that Woolmer died the day after his spineless charges succumbed to an Irish side that has shown it could bowl but has hardly threatened with the bat? Succumbed? Make that capitulated. Even if they had managed to muscle another 40 runs out of their sorry apology for an innings Pakistan would still be at the races. And only a couple of weeks after the controversy over the “fitness” of Shoaib and Mohammed Asif? And all the other extraordinary bull he’s had to put up with over the last few months?

There should be heads hanging in guilt, not just shame, this week in the Pakistan dressing room.

Posted in Cricket | No Comments »

Cricket’s great conspiracy theory

March 6th, 2007 by Gruff

It may be because I am not opening bat, but I find one of the most exhilarating things when watching or playing cricket (at any level) to be the battle between the fearsomely fast bowler and the courageous opening batsman. The classic example which springs to mind for me is the battles Michael Atherton used to have with Allan Donald.
In that case it would be fair to say that the South African paceman had the better of the exchanges, but all that seems to have changed. The balance now seems to be well and truly with the batsman.
The problem is that pitches now are so slow, and this World Cup promises to epitomise this trend. The home side is a classic example. The West Indies is immensely proud of it’s fast bowling traditions. If you look through the West Indies side now though you would struggle to find anyone with the pace to hurry most club pro’s let alone top class batsman. It is a side full of players who can ‘take the pace off the ball’, and keep it tight during power-plays. How dull.
The modern trend and ICC directives for pitch preparations and power plays to encourage big scores, are slowly killing off the fast men. Sure the best will always prosper as they learn new skills, and methods of out-foxing batsman, but once in a while can’t we just have a quick strip or two. Must the ever-decreasing WACA strip be a clone of it’s counter-part in Karachi. Fast bowlers must also be put on an even keel once in a while, and given a chance to put genuine fear into batsman, rather than just watching the ball whistle to the boundary with soul destroying repetition.
So here comes the conspiracy:
International cricket’s governing bodies are now so dependent on huge broadcasting deals that they are desperate for matches to run their full coarse in order to keep sponsors happy and to avoid having to pay out large refunds to the ticket-buying public. To this end instructions have gone out to grounds-men that they must prepare pitches accordingly. The result is that most pitches are slow, low tracks - not much fun for any bowler of quality.
The worlds best cricketers are becoming one dimensional clones, just like the pitches they play on. They are losing valuable skills by not playing on a range of surfaces - For crying out loud it even seems to spill over into the post-match interview, such is their robotic like conditioning.Some even argue for uncovered pitches again. Maybe not at the top level, but can we at least give the fast guys something to get their teeth into occasionally and make those flashy, arrogant twerps at the top of the order earn their runs. If he gets through the stage where he wonders whether he is going to get back to the pavillion alive, through courage and skill then he is worthy of his runs.A multitude of fast runs does not always equate to fascinating, absorbing cricket - At least not for everyone.

Posted in Cricket | No Comments »

Why Minnows Won’t Win The World Cup

March 5th, 2007 by Admin

From Wickman of Royal Cricket    

Wickman is in the mood for a sweeping generalisation. The difference between the minnows and the big boys is the power of the big boys to bounce back when things aren’t going too well.

Look at South Africa today. 66-7. That’s a very deep hole they’ve dug for themselves. A fightback by Hall (60 odd) and Peterson and they scrape 192 together. Not a massive statement granted, but a Houdini-like escape.They’ve probably given themselves more than a fighting chance (it’s halftime in the game). The Irish were probably thinking (Wickman doesn’t do accents)

“This one, gentlemen is in the bag. Just a shame we aren’t pulling this upset off in the tournament proper”.
Now there’s every chance that they will be referred to as “Plucky” tomorrow in the popular news media. Nobody wants to hear that.They’ve probably given themselves more than a fighting chance (it’s halftime in the game). The Irish were probably thinking (Wickman doesn’t do accents) Now there’s every chance that they will be referred to as “Plucky” tomorrow in the popular news media. Nobody wants to hear that.    

They’ve probably given themselves more than a fighting chance (it’s halftime in the game). The Irish were probably thinking (Wickman doesn’t do accents) Now there’s every chance that they will be referred to as “Plucky” tomorrow in the popular news media. Nobody wants to hear that.

They’ve probably given themselves more than a fighting chance (it’s halftime in the game). The Irish were probably thinking (Wickman doesn’t do accents) Now there’s every chance that they will be referred to as “Plucky” tomorrow in the popular news media. Nobody wants to hear that.Similarly England weren’t in rude health on a turning wicket at 132-5 and 186-6. Dalrymple’s valuable 70-odd helped haul England to a more than adequate 286. For a moment towards the end of the innings, if you narrowed your eyes a smidge, with Saj and Plunkett giving it some tap, it actually felt like England were on top.

 

Wickman reckons the problem that the “lesser” sides are going to have is not in getting a few hearts to flutter on some sporty wickets, it will be in closing games down when they’ve got a breakthrough or two. Having said that, Wickman will be glued to the (rather sad) web scorecard on bbc.co.uk to see if our emerald isled neighbours can pull a fast one on the Jaapies…

Posted in Cricket | No Comments »

Crazy Actions

February 28th, 2007 by Admin

Paul AdamsFrom Wickman of Royal Cricket

Wickman is looking forward to the World Cup because it’s been ages since he updated his repertoire of joke bowling actions for nets. Whilst still a youngster in the playground Wickman thought nothing of trying to bowl a Proctor (wrong foot), a Thomson (can you get your right hand into your left pocket round your back), a Dilley (drag the back toe so far you go through a couple of pairs of Dunlop Green Flash in a summer playing on the playground)… a Lillee (ball held out in front and pushed and pulled out in front like you were a bull pawing the ground trying to gore the entrails out of some flabby matador) or even the big lolloping run of a Botham, all last minute explosion of shoulder and massively golden arm.One might have a Michael Holding (which essentially necessitated having a lung-bustingly long run-up before trying to knock a kid’s head off ) and you would need to have some spinner or other - because if you couldn’t get turn and bounce with a tennis ball you never would – perhaps Deadly Derek Underwood (there was, of course, in the 1990s Paul Adams, that glorious freak, but if you were caught practicing that by your mum in Bentalls on a Saturday morning while she tried on some dresses she’d have had you in A&E at Kingston in a jiffy thinking you had had a seizure).

In the interim, bar a bit of back garden cricket, Wickman has had few opportunities to study and perfect the art. It’s all very well having some classics up your sleeve, but what of the modern actions? Wickman is worried that so much work has been done by the likes of Troy Cooley and Kevin Shine that there’s nothing left but chest on merchants and one-day-dobbers. 

Unless you’ve a double jointed arm / wrist combo of course so you could do a Murali. Or maybe you could practice sticking your tongue out and giving it large in front of the mirror and turn your Proctor into an Andre Nel. And then there is Makhaya Ntini although learning how to rule yourself out of ever winning an appeal for LBW might not be a brilliant idea… Wickman supposes that Brad Hogg does have that slightly mincey way of windmilling his arms and wrists… and there is old Malinga the Slinga… but who else? What fun is it to watch McGrath twinkle up the wicket? Or Flintoff? Or Taylor? Or…

Bring back Bob Willis. Frankly he’d be better that side of the camera. Stick him in the England squad, stick an Andrew Symonds wig on him and get him to hare in off that long run, alternately tucking the ball behind his back and showing it to the batsman before arriving at the crease and slinging in a massive bouncer… cor if that didn’t take you back to 1981 nothing would.

Posted in Cricket | No Comments »

Mr Cricket Writes Off Three

February 27th, 2007 by Admin

Mike HusseyFrom Wickman of  Royal Cricket
Poor old Mike “Mr Cricket” Hussey hasn’t been right about a great deal in the last fortnight. And here he is tossing out India, West Indies and England from the World cup before the tourney has begun. Fair play. Wickman’s been busy ridiculing all the facile goons who can’t face actually giving an opinion beyond “Look mate, I’m hardly going to say my own team haven’t got a hope, and I don’t want to give anyone any ammo so I’m going to say it will be the top eight seeds in the Super Eight and then anyone can win it”. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Cricket | No Comments »

Purity or Parity?

February 21st, 2007 by Gruff

Michael Holding

And so another West Indian great has decided to have a bit of a whinge. Michael Holding has claimed that the ‘World Cup will be devalued by the number of non-Test playing nations taking part’.             

The timing of this is poor to say the least plus it is a somewhat blinkered view which does a grave disservice to the ‘minnows’ who have fought hard to get to the elite ODI cricketing tournament.

Holding does make a good point that there are maybe too many teams but I thought the cricketing community was keen to share the beloved game with the rest of the world, and encourage growth. Not Michael Holding it would seem.

Holding claims ‘it is counter-productive…(to have) a team playing in the World Cup and getting absolutely hammered’. What Mr Holding has failed to recognise though is that it is not just the immediate affect of playing but its further reaching consequences.

We are of course talking about money. Something anyone associated with West Indies cricket should know the benefits of.    

The affect of Stanford’s millions is already being felt, and surely an extended World Cup can only be of benefit to the local economies of the West Indies.

These minnows can also provide the odd surprise or two. Ask Kenya last time around. Players learn from playing against the best.

Holding also claims that he can ’see nothing wrong with giving the smaller teams the odd tour and a few games against the bigger teams from time to time’. So what’s the difference between them taking a thrashing in the World Cup or at any other time. The Champions Trophy is not taken with any real seriousness by the test playing nations, and how are they expected to develop as players or their national infrastructure without greater exposure.             

I agree there are maybe a few too many teams, but it is after all a ‘World’ cup so let’s involve as much of the World as possible. Everyone loves an underdog. Apart from Michael Holding apparently.

Posted in Cricket | No Comments »

Eight Teams Could Win It!

February 19th, 2007 by Gruff

Cricket World Cup 2007From our Friend Wickman of Royal Cricket

So it has started. The World Cup predictions industry. Wickman loves it. Apparently there are eight good teams in the tournament. And one of them could win it. Wow!

First of all we get Sir Viv. Now Sir Viv has a ground opening to publicise. So first of all he wades into the England team. England, he says, are unlikely to win the World Cup. Well blow me down IVA. You are predicting that a team that has won a handful of games in the last year - and has been absolutely dicked on by Sri Lanka in its own back garden over the Summer - might struggle to win the World Cup? Well done. You haven’t lost it. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Cricket | No Comments »

England’s secrets

December 25th, 2006 by Gruff

Duncan FletcherWelcome to another episode of our England cricket podcasts.

Discover how Duncan Fletcher motivates the England players.

Listen here

Posted in Cricket, Podcasts | No Comments »

Inside England III

December 15th, 2006 by Admin

Monty & TuffersMonty Panesar revealed his frustration at not being selected in England’s Ashes XI this week. The Commentary Box can once again expose more of England’s squad secrets, as they desperately cling to faint hopes of retaining the Ashes. Lift yourself out of Ashes gloom with another installment of our satirical Ashes podcasts.

Click here to listen or download our latest Ashes podcast

Written by Fergie & Performed by AJ

Please email us if you have any comments or ideas for more podcasts.

editors
commboxeditors@googlemail.com

ferg

commboxferg@googlemail.com

Posted in Cricket, Podcasts | No Comments »

Selection spinning in Giles’ direction

December 5th, 2006 by Gruff

Since the article outlining the statistical reasons why Panesar should already be playing against Australia, never mind be picked for the Melbourne test, nothing has changed to suggest that he will get the nod in for the next test in Perth.

England have snatched defeat from a nailed on draw. Giles still looks unthreatening with the ball and on a pitch offering spin to Shane Warne and even Kevin Pietersen, but he has provided adequate support with the bat in one innings.

In fact his position in the side looks increasingly more likely for Perth. Incredible when you consider he dropped Ricky Ponting which went on to cost England 107 runs and potentially the chance to win the game. Not to mention that he now seems to be running up a non existent incline in the field, and has taken only 2 wickets in 4 innings. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Cricket | No Comments »

« Previous Entries Next Entries »